Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Black Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, Y. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Culturally Sensitive Analysis of Black Learning Style

Yvonne R. Bell

Florida A & M University

Based on analysis and research, an affect-symbolic imagery synthesis construct has been proposed as a broad explanatory construct for understanding knowledge acquisition in African Americans. This construct defines an affective (interpersonal/social) factor, a stimulus-response diversity/change factor, and a diunital/intuitive analysis and synthesisfactor as constituting a culturally unique orientation to learning and problem solving in African Americans. The affective factor defines an affinity in African Americans for "psychological closeness" to the phenomena one seeks to understand. This factor prioritizes personal-social (nonrational) attributes in knowledge acquisition. The stimulus diversity/change factor suggests an orientation toward dynamic, flexible, and varied experiential modes as opposed to repetitive, static, and regimented experiential modes. This factor projects the importance of stimulus variety and change in knowledge acquisition. The diunital/intuitive analysis and synthesis factor also is a holistic Black cultural construct of knowledge acquisition. It depicts problem solving as an integrative hemispheric endeavor rather than a linear, analyticalprocess. This construct depicts learning and problem solving as a holistic process, encompassing both affective and conceptual-expressive factors in complementary organization.

Journal of Black Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 47-61 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/00957984940201005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
H. Ono and H.-J. Tsai
Race, Parental Socioeconomic Status, and Computer Use Time Outside of School Among Young American Children, 1997 to 2003
Journal of Family Issues, December 1, 2008; 29(12): 1650 - 1672.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban EducationHome page
C. C. Park
Learning Style Preferences of Southeast Asian Students
Urban Education, September 1, 2000; 35(3): 245 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
Y. R. Bell and T. R. Clark
Culturally Relevant Reading Material as Related to Comprehension and Recall in African American Children
Journal of Black Psychology, November 1, 1998; 24(4): 455 - 475.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
T. O. Moore
Revisited Affect-Symbolic Imagery
Journal of Black Psychology, November 1, 1996; 22(4): 443 - 452.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Black StudiesHome page
N. Norment JR.
Discourse Features of African American Students' Writings
Journal of Black Studies, May 1, 1995; 25(5): 558 - 576.
[PDF]